Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 137.9x · EV/EBITDA 11.0x · ROE 2.3%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $741M | $579M | $1.1B | $2.7B | $2.0B | $2.3B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.7B | $3.6B | $3.3B | $4.6B | $4.1B | $4.1B | $4.0B | $4.4B | $2.7B | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 137.88 | 107.61 | — | 11.00 | 19.53 | 10.49 | — | 15.22 | 15.69 | 20.92 | 53.03 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.27 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.48 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.20 | 1.72 | 7.56 | 6.59 | 7.24 | 10.15 | 155.03 | 11.16 | 26.34 | 35.25 | 9.91 |
| P/FCF | 7.66 | 5.98 | 142.54 | 10.85 | 11.58 | 8.09 | 33.30 | 12.73 | 21.08 | 14.34 | 25.76 |
| P/OCF | 2.68 | 2.09 | 4.62 | 5.10 | 5.07 | 5.62 | 12.23 | 6.24 | 5.84 | 5.20 | 6.05 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.91 | 0.82 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.27 | 1.07 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.02 | 10.54 | 10.33 | 10.25 | 8.90 | 8.78 | 763.13 | 11.39 | 7.80 | 9.21 | 9.41 |
| EV / EBIT | 23.06 | 110.63 | 860.73 | 16.39 | 22.46 | 13.51 | — | 23.13 | 18.63 | 20.44 | 30.74 |
| EV / FCF | — | 37.07 | 440.67 | 18.53 | 23.71 | 14.83 | 79.11 | 28.37 | 33.89 | 21.01 | 37.79 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.9% | 8.9% | 70.9% | 17.3% | 16.8% | 17.7% | 10.6% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.6% | 16.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 4.1% | 3.5% | 6.8% | 7.6% | 7.5% | -5.5% | 4.6% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.1% | 0.1% | -3.2% | 5.9% | 2.5% | 5.2% | -5.0% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 1.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.3% | 2.3% | -46.4% | 72.1% | 41.0% | 184.4% | -168.5% | 108.2% | 172.4% | 74.7% | 13.0% |
| ROA | 0.2% | 0.2% | -3.8% | 7.3% | 3.1% | 6.5% | -4.6% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| ROIC | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.5% | 9.1% | 10.3% | 10.4% | -5.3% | 7.7% | 10.2% | 9.9% | 6.9% |
| ROCE | 6.9% | 6.9% | 5.8% | 11.9% | 13.2% | 13.1% | -6.9% | 8.9% | 8.6% | 8.3% | 6.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 9.10 | 9.10 | 16.31 | 4.93 | 7.89 | 8.85 | 223.31 | 14.10 | 17.13 | 18.52 | 5.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.01 | 9.01 | 7.21 | 4.49 | 4.74 | 4.18 | 462.70 | 6.45 | 3.16 | 3.30 | 3.39 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 8.92 | 15.81 | 4.66 | 7.58 | 8.46 | 213.27 | 13.72 | 16.01 | 16.40 | 4.63 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.84 | 8.84 | 6.99 | 4.25 | 4.56 | 3.99 | 441.90 | 6.28 | 2.95 | 2.93 | 2.99 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 31.09 | 298.13 | 7.68 | 12.13 | 6.74 | 45.81 | 15.64 | 12.81 | 6.67 | 12.03 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.06 | 5.42 | 3.39 | 5.33 | -2.72 | 3.88 | 3.23 | 3.68 | 2.15 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.47 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.40 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.25 | 1.17 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.25 | 0.94 | 1.15 | 1.67 | 1.64 | 1.61 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 16.71 | 54.79 | 42.68 | 42.86 | 45.77 | 39.92 | 47.52 | 68.58 | 54.55 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 9.43 | 10.59 | 8.22 | 12.01 | 10.90 | 11.91 | 12.44 | 10.81 | 9.59 | 11.58 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.2% | 6.6% | 7.8% | 3.1% | 2.5% | — | 1.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 711.3% | 711.3% | — | 33.9% | 48.8% | — | — | 27.4% | 31.1% | 30.9% | 75.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.7% | 0.9% | — | 9.1% | 5.1% | 9.5% | — | 6.6% | 6.4% | 4.8% | 1.9% |
| FCF Yield | 13.1% | 16.7% | 0.7% | 9.2% | 8.6% | 12.4% | 3.0% | 7.9% | 4.7% | 7.0% | 3.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 25.4% | 2.6% | 5.5% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 5.4% | 6.8% | 12.8% | 15.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.2% | 6.6% | 33.2% | 5.7% | 8.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 7.2% | 8.8% | 14.3% | 16.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $85M | $86M | $96M | $99M | $108M | $87M | $90M | $94M | $100M | $114M |
High Debt Service Burden
According to recent market data, BLMN trades at a trailing P/E of 142.16, which appears disconnected from its stagnant growth profile and suggests that investors are pricing in significant recovery potential that remains unsupported by the company's current thin net margins and high leverage ratios.
The disparity between the elevated trailing P/E and the forward P/E of 10.20 indicates that the market anticipates a sharp rebound in earnings, likely driven by cost-cutting or operational improvements. However, given the historical volatility in net income, this valuation may be overly optimistic, as it assumes a level of earnings stability that the company has struggled to maintain over the past ten quarters.
Based on reported figures, BLMN's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching a low of -1.1% in 2025Q3, which indicates that the company is currently failing to generate returns on invested capital that exceed its cost of debt, thereby eroding shareholder value rather than compounding it over time.
The erratic ROIC trend suggests that the company's capital allocation is hampered by its heavy debt load and the high maintenance requirements of its restaurant portfolio. Investors should monitor whether management can improve unit-level economics to drive ROIC back toward historical highs, or if the current capital structure will continue to suppress returns.
As reported in financial statements, BLMN's cash conversion cycle has shown extreme instability, swinging from a positive 3 days in 2025Q1 to a negative 10 days in 2025Q3, which suggests that the company's working capital management is highly sensitive to shifts in supplier payment terms and inventory turnover.
The inconsistency in the cash conversion cycle implies that the company may be using its payables as a liquidity buffer, which is a common but risky practice in the casual dining sector. This reliance on supplier leverage warrants further investigation, as it may mask underlying operational inefficiencies that could be exposed during a period of sustained traffic decline.
According to recent SEC filings, BLMN's debt-to-equity ratio reached a peak of 9.10 in 2025Q4, a level that significantly exceeds industry norms and suggests that the company's financial position is highly vulnerable to interest rate volatility and potential covenant breaches in the near term.
The high leverage ratio, combined with an interest coverage ratio that has dipped into negative territory, indicates that the company is operating with minimal margin for error. This debt-heavy structure likely forces management to prioritize interest payments over necessary capital reinvestment, potentially leading to long-term brand degradation.
Based on an analysis of the business model, the P/E ratio is a fundamentally flawed metric for BLMN, as it fails to account for the massive lease obligations and high debt service costs that distort net income and obscure the company's true cash-generating capacity.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or free cash flow yields to better understand the company's operational performance, as these metrics are less sensitive to the accounting noise created by high leverage and non-recurring items. Relying on P/E in this context may lead to a misinterpretation of the company's actual valuation relative to its peers.
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BLMN stock.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 137.9x. The historical average is 29.6x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.7x.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 2.3%. The historical average is 56.1%.
Based on historical data, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 137.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 5.16% with a payout ratio of 711.3%.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. has 8.9% gross margin and 4.1% operating margin.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.