Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 3.5x · EV/EBITDA 4.6x · ROE 2.7%. (2021–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 3.53 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.86 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.60 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 2.7% | 2.7% | 3.7% | 6.3% | 4.1% |
| ROA | 2.4% | 2.4% | 3.5% | 5.8% | 3.7% |
| ROIC | -5.9% | -5.9% | -2.4% | -0.8% | — |
| ROCE | -7.9% | -7.9% | -3.1% | -1.0% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.62 | 1.62 | 0.19 | 0.01 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.97 | 0.02 | 0.00 | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.57 | 1.57 | 0.15 | 0.00 | -0.08 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -18.59 | -18.59 | -277.82 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 12.81 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 12.81 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 5.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 28.4% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $10M | $22M | $29M | $29M |
Imminent insolvency and liquidity
According to the latest financial data, BGL's P/E ratio of 4.12 and EV/EBITDA of 5.11 appear fundamentally disconnected from the company's pre-revenue status, suggesting that these valuation metrics are artifacts of non-operating accounting adjustments rather than indicators of genuine market-implied growth or sustainable earning power.
The reported multiples are likely misleading because they rely on volatile net income figures that do not reflect core mining operations. Investors should view these ratios as noise, as the absence of revenue renders standard valuation benchmarks like P/S or forward P/E entirely inapplicable to the current business model.
Based on reported figures, BGL's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -1.5% in 2024Q4, which indicates that the company is failing to generate any meaningful return on its invested capital while its asset base undergoes a rapid and concerning contraction.
The negative ROIC trend highlights the inefficiency of the company's current exploration-heavy strategy, which has yet to yield a productive asset. This decay suggests that capital is being consumed by administrative overhead rather than being deployed into projects capable of generating future economic value.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, BGL's current ratio has deteriorated to a precarious 0.03, signaling an extreme inability to cover short-term liabilities and suggesting that the company's survival is entirely dependent on immediate, potentially dilutive, external capital injections to maintain its Ghanaian mining concessions.
The near-zero quick ratio confirms that the company lacks the liquid assets necessary to sustain its operations, leaving it highly vulnerable to even minor regulatory or operational shocks. This liquidity position warrants extreme caution, as it implies the company is effectively operating on a day-to-day basis.
While the company reports a low debt-to-equity ratio of 1.00%, financial statements indicate this is not a sign of financial strength but rather a reflection of the company's inability to access credit markets, leaving it exposed to the risks of equity-based financing in a volatile sector.
The lack of significant debt service obligations is overshadowed by the company's inability to generate internal cash flow, which forces a reliance on equity markets. Investors should monitor whether management attempts to leverage the balance sheet, as the current lack of debt may be the only factor preventing immediate insolvency.
The most commonly misapplied metric for BGL is the P/E ratio, which obscures the company's pre-revenue status and creates a false sense of profitability that is entirely detached from the reality of its ongoing exploration-stage cash burn and lack of commercial production.
Analysts should instead focus on the 'burn rate' and 'remaining cash runway' relative to concession maintenance costs, as these provide a more accurate picture of the company's viability. Using earnings-based multiples for a pre-revenue junior miner is fundamentally flawed and ignores the primary risk of capital depletion.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BGL stock.
Blue Gold Limited's current P/E ratio is 3.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Blue Gold Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 4.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Blue Gold Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 2.7%. The historical average is 4.2%.
Based on historical data, Blue Gold Limited is trading at a P/E of 3.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Blue Gold Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.