Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -66.2%. (2023–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.2B | $6.5B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.7B | $5.0B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.52 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 118.57 | 181.56 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.40 | 3.56 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 139.14 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 72.2% | 72.2% | -39.0% | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1046.3% | -1046.3% | -1803.7% | -1214.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2094.2% | -2094.2% | -1826.4% | -1143.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -66.2% | -66.2% | -67.1% | -45.5% |
| ROA | -53.4% | -53.4% | -44.3% | -30.3% |
| ROIC | -91.4% | -91.4% | -69.0% | -48.7% |
| ROCE | -28.0% | -28.0% | -47.2% | -34.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.39 | 0.40 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.83 | -0.30 | -0.26 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -56.44 | -56.44 | -23.08 | -494.83 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.7B) exceeds total debt ($204M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 22.77 | 22.77 | 5.79 | 7.74 |
| Quick Ratio | 22.77 | 22.77 | 5.72 | 7.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 22.45 | 22.45 | 5.33 | 7.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 5.73 | 1.13 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 58.90 | 293.97 | 135.76 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $229M | $224M | $224M |
FAA Certification Delay Risk
Based on reported figures, BETA trades at a P/S multiple of 104.21, which, according to industry data, significantly exceeds the valuation multiples of its publicly traded peers like Joby Aviation and Archer Aviation, suggesting that investors are pricing in the long-term strategic value of its proprietary charging infrastructure.
The elevated P/S ratio implies that the market views BETA not merely as an aircraft manufacturer, but as a platform provider with potential for high-margin recurring revenue. This valuation appears to hinge on the successful deployment of the Charge Cube network, which may create a structural competitive advantage that justifies a premium over pure-play airframe competitors.
As reported in financial statements, BETA's ROIC has remained deeply negative, hovering around -30.8% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently in a phase of heavy capital destruction as it prioritizes infrastructure build-out and certification milestones over immediate returns on invested capital.
The persistent negative ROIC is a direct consequence of the massive R&D and infrastructure spending required to reach FAA certification. Investors should monitor whether these returns begin to improve as the company transitions from a development-heavy model to a commercial production phase, as current efficiency metrics are heavily skewed by pre-revenue investment cycles.
According to recent SEC filings, BETA's cash conversion cycle has shown extreme volatility, with DSO reaching 54 days in 2026Q1, reflecting the lumpy nature of milestone-based government contract payments that characterize the firm's current revenue recognition and working capital management strategy compared to more mature industrial peers.
The significant fluctuations in DPO and DSO suggest that the company's working capital efficiency is currently dictated by the timing of DoD contract milestones rather than standard commercial operations. This lack of predictability in cash inflows warrants further investigation into the firm's ability to manage liquidity during periods of extended development delays.
Based on the company's financial statements, BETA maintains a current ratio of 21.37 as of 2026Q1, which provides an exceptionally high margin of safety that, according to our analysis, effectively mitigates the immediate risks associated with its high cash burn rate and ongoing certification-related capital requirements.
The company's liquidity position appears strong enough to sustain its current burn rate for the foreseeable future, providing management with the necessary runway to navigate the complex FAA certification process. This fortress-like liquidity profile is a critical differentiator that allows the firm to avoid the dilutive financing pressures often faced by its less-capitalized competitors.
As reported in financial statements, the P/S ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for BETA, as it fails to account for the company's dual-revenue stream model, which combines low-margin aircraft manufacturing with potentially high-margin, recurring revenue from its proprietary charging infrastructure network.
Relying solely on P/S multiples obscures the long-term value of the Charge Cube network, which may eventually decouple from aircraft sales. Analysts should instead focus on infrastructure utilization rates and the conversion of LOIs into firm orders to better assess the company's true commercial viability and long-term earning power.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BETA stock.
BETA Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -4.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
BETA Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -66.2%. The historical average is -59.6%.
Based on historical data, BETA Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -4.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BETA Technologies, Inc. has 72.2% gross margin and -1046.3% operating margin.