Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -81.7%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23M | $25M | $46M | $88M | $173M | $165M | $455M | $21M | $28M | $19M | $16M |
| Enterprise Value | $24M | $26M | $44M | $78M | $173M | $145M | $431M | $18M | $31M | $21M | $18M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 1.30 | 7.87 | 18.35 | 73.30 | 4.07 | 4.57 | 13.54 | 5.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.87 | 1.02 | 1.12 | 1.77 | 7.46 | 6.36 | 15.62 | 3.57 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.91 | 0.89 | 1.16 | 7.87 | 16.15 | 69.40 | 3.43 | 5.05 | 15.08 | 6.51 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.5% | 12.5% | 14.8% | 1.8% | -7.6% | -10.8% | -11.4% | -3.0% | -3.1% | -33.5% | -5.2% |
| Operating Margin | -59.3% | -59.3% | -23.6% | -24.1% | -89.6% | -73.3% | -83.9% | -64.0% | -41.0% | -191.2% | -100.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -95.6% | -95.6% | -22.9% | -23.8% | -89.5% | -73.3% | -83.9% | -77.0% | -58.4% | -215.4% | -94.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -81.7% | -81.7% | -24.8% | -44.2% | -80.0% | -23.9% | -29.8% | -235.3% | — | — | — |
| ROA | -51.8% | -51.8% | -16.2% | -27.8% | -57.6% | -20.8% | -25.9% | -73.0% | -107.0% | -114.8% | -132.9% |
| ROIC | -39.3% | -39.3% | -22.1% | -38.3% | -100.8% | -90.1% | -105.2% | -165.1% | -168.8% | -173.4% | -558.2% |
| ROCE | -42.5% | -42.5% | -21.4% | -38.1% | -75.5% | -22.4% | -28.2% | -180.3% | — | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.10 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.02 | -0.06 | -0.18 | 0.00 | -0.77 | -0.83 | -0.56 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1053.19 | -1053.19 | -333.59 | -1336.33 | -19679.00 | -6594.00 | -436.91 | -4.49 | -2.30 | -5.41 | -8.54 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.74 | 1.74 | 2.04 | 2.41 | 1.51 | 9.33 | 16.89 | 4.52 | 0.51 | 0.78 | 0.45 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.11 | 1.71 | 0.58 | 8.78 | 16.27 | 3.26 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.37 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.34 | 0.62 | 0.13 | 7.43 | 15.08 | 2.63 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.58 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.70 | 1.77 | 0.44 | 1.35 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.53 | 2.53 | 3.42 | 5.54 | 1.93 | 6.19 | 6.33 | 2.86 | 5.62 | 0.81 | 10.77 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 106.46 | 59.39 | 87.03 | 73.50 | 156.27 | 105.62 | 54.71 | 76.45 | 1.54 | 152.37 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $17M | $15M | $12M | $10M | $9M | $6M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $2M |
Critical Liquidity and Dilution
As reported in recent financial filings, BEEM trades at a P/S multiple of 0.79, which appears to reflect a significant hardware-only discount compared to infrastructure peers that benefit from recurring software revenue streams and more predictable, long-term service contracts within the broader energy sector.
The current valuation suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's future growth potential due to its recent revenue contraction and lack of a clear path to profitability. Investors should monitor whether this multiple remains depressed as a result of the company's reliance on lumpy, project-based government procurement cycles.
Based on the company's reported figures, ROIC has trended into deeply negative territory, reaching -21.8% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its core manufacturing and deployment activities in the off-grid solar market.
The persistent negative return on capital suggests that the company's current cost structure is fundamentally misaligned with its revenue generation capabilities. This trend warrants further investigation into whether management can achieve the necessary scale to turn these returns positive or if the business model remains structurally incapable of generating adequate returns.
According to recent quarterly data, the cash conversion cycle has expanded to 288 days in 2026Q1, a significant increase from the 91 days observed in 2023Q4, suggesting that the company is facing mounting difficulties in managing its inventory and collecting payments from its government-heavy customer base.
The sharp rise in the cash conversion cycle appears to be driven by both increasing days inventory outstanding and days sales outstanding, which may indicate that finished goods are sitting idle or that payment terms are becoming increasingly difficult to enforce. This inefficiency places additional strain on the company's already limited cash reserves.
As indicated in the latest balance sheet, the quick ratio has declined to 0.67 in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company's ability to meet its immediate financial obligations without relying on inventory liquidation is becoming increasingly compromised in the current high-burn operational environment.
The rapid depletion of cash relative to ongoing operating losses indicates that the company may soon face a liquidity crisis if it cannot secure additional financing. Investors should monitor the company's ability to manage its current liabilities, as the current ratio of 1.47 provides only a thin buffer against further operational volatility.
The P/S ratio is frequently misapplied to this business model, as it obscures the company's lack of recurring revenue and the high volatility of its project-based sales, which makes trailing revenue a poor indicator of future cash flow generation or long-term enterprise value.
Analysts should instead focus on the 'avoided cost' value proposition for customers, as the company's true competitive advantage lies in bypassing civil engineering and grid-interconnection expenses. Relying on standard revenue multiples fails to capture the potential for premium pricing that this unique off-grid architecture may command in specific niche markets.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BEEM stock.
Beam Global's current P/E ratio is -0.8x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Beam Global's return on equity (ROE) is -81.7%. The historical average is -91.3%.
Based on historical data, Beam Global is trading at a P/E of -0.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Beam Global has 12.5% gross margin and -59.3% operating margin.