Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 7.0x · EV/EBITDA 12.2x · ROE 5.9%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $90M | $131M | $152M | $173M | $222M | $211M | $95M | $80M | $129M | $127M | $148M |
| Enterprise Value | $393M | $434M | $399M | $468M | $590M | $530M | $462M | $234M | $224M | $226M | $322M |
| P/E Ratio → | 6.97 | 11.38 | — | 15.16 | — | 8.12 | 3.02 | — | — | 37.89 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.26 | 3.31 | 7.33 | 3.99 | 36.69 | 4.03 | 2.00 | 9.00 | 16.77 | 5.13 | 8.78 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.38 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.95 | 0.75 | 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.45 |
| P/FCF | 1.35 | 1.97 | 16.19 | 7.81 | — | 3.46 | 0.78 | — | 5.35 | 1.42 | 2.87 |
| P/OCF | 1.35 | 1.97 | 16.19 | 7.81 | — | 3.46 | 0.78 | — | 5.35 | 1.42 | 2.87 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.94 | 19.30 | 10.81 | 97.66 | 10.11 | 9.67 | 26.33 | 29.09 | 9.14 | 19.12 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.24 | 13.54 | — | 42.72 | — | 19.28 | 14.63 | — | — | 66.81 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 12.11 | 13.54 | — | 42.72 | — | 19.28 | 14.63 | — | — | 66.81 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 6.52 | 42.64 | 21.16 | — | 8.66 | 3.80 | — | 9.28 | 2.54 | 6.25 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71.3% | 71.3% | -0.5% | 41.6% | -193.1% | 74.0% | 78.5% | 6.8% | 3.9% | 69.1% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | 81.7% | 81.7% | -32.8% | 25.3% | -334.7% | 52.4% | 66.1% | -141.0% | -124.2% | 13.7% | -6.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 28.9% | 28.9% | -28.7% | 26.3% | -347.7% | 49.7% | 66.1% | -141.0% | -124.2% | 13.7% | -6.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.9% | 5.9% | -3.0% | 5.1% | -8.2% | 10.5% | 17.1% | -7.0% | -4.7% | 1.3% | -0.4% |
| ROA | 2.4% | 2.4% | -1.2% | 1.9% | -3.3% | 4.2% | 6.9% | -4.2% | -3.2% | 1.0% | -0.3% |
| ROIC | 5.1% | 5.1% | -1.0% | 1.4% | -2.5% | 3.4% | 5.3% | -3.1% | -2.4% | 0.6% | -0.2% |
| ROCE | 6.7% | 6.7% | -1.4% | 1.9% | -3.2% | 4.4% | 6.9% | -4.4% | -3.5% | 1.0% | -0.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.47 | 1.47 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 1.61 | 1.24 | 1.73 | 1.01 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.53 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.56 | 9.56 | — | 29.40 | — | 12.64 | 11.82 | — | — | 29.93 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.45 | 1.39 | 1.38 | 1.59 | 1.14 | 1.69 | 1.01 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 9.45 | 9.45 | — | 26.94 | — | 11.59 | 11.60 | — | — | 29.33 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.55 | 26.45 | 13.35 | — | 5.20 | 3.01 | — | 3.93 | 1.12 | 3.38 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.56 | 1.56 | -0.33 | 0.43 | -1.14 | 2.01 | 3.07 | -1.51 | -1.29 | 0.44 | -0.11 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 6.85 | 7.68 | 2.46 | 7.43 | 32.53 | 193.41 | 0.29 | 999999.00 | 215529.41 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 6.85 | 7.68 | 2.46 | 7.43 | 32.53 | 193.41 | 0.29 | 999999.00 | 215529.41 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 4.81 | 6.05 | 1.03 | 3.90 | 6.42 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 26.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 188.3% | 188.3% | — | — | — | 75.5% | 33.4% | — | — | 513.9% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 14.3% | 8.8% | — | 6.6% | — | 12.3% | 33.1% | — | — | 2.6% | — |
| FCF Yield | 74.3% | 50.8% | 6.2% | 12.8% | — | 28.9% | 127.4% | — | 18.7% | 70.2% | 34.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 10.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 37.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $11M | $9M | $10M | $10M | $9M | $5M | $4M | $4M | $4M | $4M |
Portfolio Valuation Volatility
According to recent market data, BCIC trades at a P/B ratio of 0.37, which significantly trails the peer group average and suggests that investors are heavily discounting the firm's net asset value due to persistent concerns regarding the quality and liquidity of its underlying private credit portfolio.
The forward P/E of 4.26 appears to imply a market expectation of earnings contraction or a permanent impairment of the investment base. This valuation gap relative to peers like Ares Capital suggests that the market is pricing in a high probability of future write-downs rather than rewarding the firm for its recent revenue growth.
Based on reported financial statements, BCIC's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, frequently dipping into negative values such as the -0.6% observed in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm is currently failing to generate a sustainable return on its invested capital base.
The inability to consistently compound returns suggests that the firm's underwriting process may be struggling to overcome the high management fee structure inherent in the BDC model. Investors should monitor whether this decay in returns is a structural issue related to deal selection or a temporary byproduct of the current rapid deployment phase.
As reported in quarterly filings, BCIC's asset turnover remains extremely low at 0.03, highlighting a fundamental inefficiency in how the firm converts its investment portfolio into recurring revenue compared to more established middle-market lenders within the broader financial services sector.
The extreme fluctuations in DSO, which reached as high as 1603 in 2024Q2, suggest that the timing of cash collections from borrowers is highly unpredictable. This lack of operational rhythm complicates the firm's ability to manage liquidity and may necessitate more frequent reliance on external financing to bridge gaps in cash flow.
According to the provided balance sheet data, BCIC maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.74 as of 2026Q1, which, while appearing moderate, warrants caution given the firm's history of negative net income and the potential for covenant pressure if portfolio valuations continue to experience downward volatility.
The interest coverage ratio has frequently turned negative, suggesting that the firm's debt service capacity is currently insufficient to be supported by operating income alone. This reliance on capital recycling or external funding to meet obligations indicates a vulnerable balance sheet that may struggle under sustained credit market stress.
Investors frequently misapply the P/B ratio to BCIC, failing to recognize that in a BDC with significant Level 3 assets, the book value is an accounting estimate rather than a reflection of realizable liquidation value, thereby obscuring the true risk of portfolio impairment.
A more appropriate metric would be the Net Investment Income (NII) yield adjusted for non-accrual loans, as this provides a clearer view of the cash-generating capacity of the portfolio. Relying solely on P/B ignores the potential for significant fair-value adjustments that can rapidly erode the equity base.
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BCIC stock.
BCP Investment Corporation's current P/E ratio is 7.0x. The historical average is 17.8x. This places it at the 17th percentile of its historical range.
BCP Investment Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 12.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 24.5x.
BCP Investment Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 5.9%. The historical average is 1.7%.
Based on historical data, BCP Investment Corporation is trading at a P/E of 7.0x. This is at the 17th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BCP Investment Corporation's current dividend yield is 26.90% with a payout ratio of 188.3%.
BCP Investment Corporation has 71.3% gross margin and 81.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
BCP Investment Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.