Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -20.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.3B | $15.1B | $5.1B | $6.6B | $1.1B | $2.4B | $8.4B | $3.7B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $17.4B | $17.2B | $6.2B | $7.9B | $2.5B | $3.7B | $8.5B | $3.4B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -20.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 30.39 | 30.05 | 23.01 | 706.43 | 14.47 | 34.54 | 1017.17 | 90.82 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 77.77 | 7.74 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 34.35 | 27.74 | 853.04 | 31.82 | 53.65 | 1034.11 | 84.12 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 94.4% | 94.4% | 98.3% | 73.7% | 95.6% | 95.5% | 100.0% | 93.8% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -113.3% | -113.3% | -267.2% | -6528.8% | -659.6% | -827.1% | -5752.0% | -656.4% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -145.3% | -145.3% | -241.4% | -6913.9% | -619.7% | -806.9% | -5439.7% | -642.1% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | -153.7% | -139.1% | — | — |
| ROA | -78.6% | -78.6% | -73.1% | -110.0% | -58.8% | -65.5% | -67.2% | -47.5% | -46.4% | -31.2% |
| ROIC | -524.0% | -524.0% | — | -738.8% | -135.1% | -121.1% | -157.6% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -80.6% | -80.6% | -101.6% | -134.4% | -74.3% | -77.6% | -80.5% | -53.1% | -70.4% | -49.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.60 | 0.19 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.29 | -0.57 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -12.84 | -12.84 | -4.46 | -7.04 | -5.03 | -11.54 | -12.79 | -31.92 | -72.11 | -3370.69 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.62 | 2.62 | 4.67 | 3.32 | 4.52 | 6.58 | 6.72 | 9.42 | 13.67 | 11.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.52 | 2.52 | 4.67 | 3.32 | 4.52 | 6.58 | 6.72 | 9.42 | 13.67 | 11.36 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.04 | 2.04 | 4.41 | 3.02 | 3.89 | 6.19 | 6.35 | 9.04 | 13.39 | 10.76 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.06 | 1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 101.37 | 7.77 | 68.70 | 80.28 | 103.40 | — | 25.60 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 8.5% | 0.9% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 8.5% | 0.9% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $197M | $186M | $163M | $147M | $144M | $118M | $105M | $92M | $92M |
Binary clinical regulatory outcomes
According to recent market data, BridgeBio trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 27.40, a valuation that appears to heavily discount future commercial success for acoramidis while largely ignoring the current lack of consistent, recurring revenue streams typical of established biotechnology firms in the sector.
The elevated P/S ratio suggests that investors are pricing the company as a platform-based growth engine rather than a traditional pharmaceutical entity. This valuation implies high expectations for market share capture in the ATTR-CM space, which may leave little room for error should regulatory or commercial timelines face further delays.
As reported in financial statements, BridgeBio's ROIC of -50.2% in 2026Q1 highlights the significant challenge of compounding capital within a hub-and-spoke model that prioritizes broad clinical development over immediate, margin-accretive returns on invested capital compared to mature peers like Vertex Pharmaceuticals.
The persistent negative returns on capital indicate that the company is currently in a value-destructive phase of its lifecycle, which is expected given the heavy R&D burden. Investors should monitor whether the transition to commercialization can eventually drive ROIC toward positive territory as the hub infrastructure is leveraged across multiple successful product launches.
Based on quarterly filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has shown extreme fluctuations, ranging from -452 days to 56 days in recent periods, which suggests that the timing of milestone payments and clinical trial expenses creates significant, unpredictable pressure on operational working capital management.
The erratic nature of the CCC reflects the company's reliance on non-recurring collaboration milestones rather than steady-state product sales. This volatility makes it difficult to assess the underlying efficiency of the hub-and-spoke model, as working capital metrics are currently dominated by the timing of clinical events rather than standard inventory or receivable cycles.
As indicated by the current ratio of 1.44 in 2026Q1, BridgeBio maintains a tightening liquidity position that warrants close monitoring, especially as the company continues to burn cash to support its extensive clinical pipeline and prepare for the commercial launch of its lead therapeutic candidate.
While the current ratio appears adequate on the surface, the rapid depletion of cash reserves suggests that the company may need to return to capital markets to sustain operations. The reliance on external financing to maintain this liquidity buffer introduces ongoing dilution risk for existing shareholders.
Investors frequently misapply the P/E ratio to BridgeBio, a metric that is fundamentally uninformative for a pre-commercial biotech firm with negative earnings, thereby obscuring the true value of the company's clinical pipeline and the potential for future royalty-based cash flows from its decentralized subsidiary structure.
Using P/E to evaluate a company in this stage of development is misleading because it ignores the massive R&D investments that are currently suppressing net income. A more appropriate framework would involve a risk-adjusted net present value analysis of the pipeline, which accounts for the probability of success for each clinical asset rather than relying on historical accounting earnings.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BBIO stock.
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -20.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -20.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. has 94.4% gross margin and -113.3% operating margin.