Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -18.7%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3M | $4M | $75M | $969M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3M | $4M | $73M | $965M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.88 | 2.80 | 56.64 | 677.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.10 | 0.19 | 38.83 | 221.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.86 | 55.37 | 673.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 53.7% | 57.4% | 65.4% | 64.1% | 70.8% | 77.5% | 10.7% | 7.1% | 9.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -213.7% | -213.7% | -194.5% | -150.0% | -82.6% | -182.8% | -4.6% | -62.0% | -33.3% | -75.4% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -149.6% | -149.6% | -186.8% | -146.9% | -90.9% | -248.2% | 10.3% | -78.9% | -33.6% | -26.8% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -18.7% | -18.7% | -78.3% | -70.7% | -69.2% | -54.7% | 7.0% | -15.4% | -14.5% | -5.4% | -6.6% |
| ROA | -16.4% | -16.4% | -55.0% | -49.2% | -44.9% | -42.3% | 6.1% | -15.1% | -10.6% | -3.5% | -6.5% |
| ROIC | -21.5% | -21.5% | -1623.4% | -1669.6% | -73.3% | -48.6% | -3.5% | -13.9% | -31.8% | -78.9% | — |
| ROCE | -26.4% | -26.4% | -75.8% | -68.9% | -61.6% | -38.8% | -3.0% | -12.1% | -10.8% | -10.1% | -6.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.00 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 74.14 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | -0.87 | -1.00 | -0.87 | -0.12 | -0.53 | -0.06 | -0.62 | -0.72 | -1.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | -584.83 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 11.82 | 11.82 | 2.48 | 4.84 | 1.65 | 2.98 | 5.47 | 42.11 | 53.10 | 18.77 | 285.52 |
| Quick Ratio | 11.81 | 11.81 | 2.44 | 4.79 | 1.61 | 2.46 | 4.91 | 42.11 | 53.10 | 18.77 | 285.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 1.82 | 4.51 | 1.17 | 1.98 | 3.39 | 32.68 | 40.02 | 12.88 | 285.52 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.25 | 0.67 | 0.22 | 0.48 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.09 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 25.78 | 25.78 | 12.16 | 10.32 | 14.39 | 0.44 | 1.32 | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 3.52 | 16.14 | 17.08 | 3.52 | 0.46 | 18.61 | 222.30 | 102.83 | 367.12 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $801081 | $1M | $2M | $2M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M |
Severe liquidity and solvency
Based on reported figures, ATPC trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 2.00, which appears disconnected from the company's negative earnings and persistent cash burn, suggesting that the market may be pricing the equity on speculative option value rather than any tangible fundamental performance or earnings growth.
The absence of a positive P/E ratio and the lack of meaningful EBITDA generation render traditional valuation multiples largely irrelevant for assessing the company's intrinsic value. Investors should monitor whether the current premium valuation can be sustained in the absence of a clear path to profitability, as the market appears to be ignoring the significant risk of further equity dilution.
As reported in financial statements, ATPC has consistently generated negative ROIC, with figures reaching as low as -173.2% in 2024Q4, indicating that the company is failing to compound capital and is instead eroding shareholder value through an inability to generate returns above its cost of capital.
The consistent negative return on invested capital suggests that the firm's core business model is structurally incapable of creating value under its current cost structure. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company's advisory-led model can ever achieve the scale necessary to turn these returns positive, or if the current capital allocation strategy is fundamentally flawed.
According to recent quarterly data, ATPC's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated wildly, ranging from -28 days to 26 days, which suggests that the company is relying on aggressive management of payables and receivables to navigate its precarious liquidity position rather than achieving true operational efficiency.
The extreme volatility in the cash conversion cycle indicates that the company's working capital management is reactive rather than strategic. Investors should monitor the DSO and DIO trends closely, as any deterioration in collection times could further exacerbate the firm's already severe liquidity constraints.
Based on the most recent quarterly filings, ATPC's cash reserves have dwindled to $140,072, a level that appears insufficient to support the company's ongoing operating losses, suggesting that the firm is approaching a critical liquidity cliff that may necessitate immediate and potentially dilutive external financing.
While the current ratio remains elevated due to accounting distortions, the actual cash position is alarmingly low relative to the company's quarterly burn rate. This liquidity profile suggests that the firm is highly vulnerable to even minor operational disruptions, which could rapidly exhaust the remaining cash buffer and threaten its ability to continue as a going concern.
The price-to-book ratio of 0.11 is frequently misapplied by investors as a signal of deep value, yet this metric obscures the reality that the company's book value is largely composed of non-productive assets that offer little protection against the ongoing erosion of shareholder equity.
Investors should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the sustainability of the operating model, as the P/B ratio fails to account for the company's inability to generate positive cash flow. Relying on book value in this context is misleading, as it ignores the potential for further impairment of assets and the persistent destruction of capital inherent in the current business model.
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ATPC stock.
Agape ATP Corporation's current P/E ratio is -1.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Agape ATP Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -18.7%. The historical average is -32.7%.
Based on historical data, Agape ATP Corporation is trading at a P/E of -1.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Agape ATP Corporation has 53.7% gross margin and -213.7% operating margin.