Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 24.4x · EV/EBITDA 11.7x · ROE 3.2%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.3B | $4.8B | $3.3B | $4.4B | $4.1B | $9.1B | $9.3B | $7.1B | $4.7B | $4.3B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.8B | $11.2B | $9.9B | $11.8B | $11.6B | $15.2B | $13.7B | $10.9B | $8.0B | $7.3B | $5.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 24.39 | 26.74 | — | 210.67 | — | 35.24 | 12.01 | 13.35 | 25.13 | 30.16 | 25.70 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.77 | 1.95 | 1.40 | 1.82 | 1.48 | 4.00 | 5.54 | 4.35 | 2.84 | 2.74 | 2.85 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 1.18 | 1.55 | 1.49 | 1.16 | 1.28 | 1.24 |
| P/FCF | 2.40 | 2.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 7.14 | 7.86 | 7.10 | 6.83 | 6.90 | 58.23 | 17.46 | 11.31 | 9.31 | 11.79 | 10.83 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.62 | 4.28 | 4.93 | 4.18 | 6.67 | 8.19 | 6.73 | 4.84 | 4.67 | 6.65 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.71 | 12.18 | 10.75 | 12.67 | 13.47 | 18.59 | 19.66 | 16.81 | 12.76 | 11.46 | 17.26 |
| EV / EBIT | 20.67 | 21.36 | 17.51 | 44.52 | — | 41.02 | 14.09 | 14.86 | 28.02 | 21.45 | 27.90 |
| EV / FCF | — | 6.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 73.7% | 73.7% | 74.4% | 69.1% | 68.7% | 68.6% | 76.1% | 72.7% | 70.6% | 74.2% | 73.1% |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | 21.5% | 19.2% | 19.4% | 14.5% | 18.2% | 22.9% | 22.6% | 22.9% | 24.1% | 21.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.4% | 7.4% | -59.5% | 1.2% | -7.7% | 11.6% | 46.7% | 32.6% | 11.2% | 9.8% | 11.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.2% | 3.2% | -21.0% | 0.4% | -2.9% | 3.9% | 14.6% | 12.1% | 5.0% | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | -7.8% | 0.2% | -1.2% | 1.8% | 6.5% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| ROIC | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 3.0% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 5.0% | 3.4% |
| ROCE | 3.7% | 3.7% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 2.6% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 3.9% | 4.5% | 5.6% | 3.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.05 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 1.70 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.07 | 7.07 | 7.26 | 8.03 | 8.76 | 7.61 | 6.50 | 6.04 | 5.34 | 4.80 | 10.12 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.29 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 1.65 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.04 | 7.04 | 7.22 | 8.00 | 8.69 | 7.46 | 6.36 | 5.94 | 5.27 | 4.73 | 9.86 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.67 | 1.67 | 1.64 | 0.81 | -0.26 | 1.62 | 5.36 | 4.06 | 1.87 | 2.20 | 1.98 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.86 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.83 | 2.83 | 2.66 | 3.34 | 3.85 | 4.02 | 2.98 | 4.87 | 5.06 | 4.55 | 13.66 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.7% | 4.3% | 8.3% | 7.5% | 8.9% | 3.3% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 3.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 113.3% | 113.3% | — | 1145.2% | — | 114.9% | 34.1% | 37.9% | 85.4% | 88.5% | 90.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.1% | 3.7% | — | 0.5% | — | 2.8% | 8.3% | 7.5% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 3.9% |
| FCF Yield | 41.6% | 37.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.7% | 4.3% | 8.3% | 7.9% | 8.9% | 3.3% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 3.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $772M | $732M | $691M | $629M | $629M | $564M | $500M | $466M | $386M | $274M |
High regulatory and leverage risk
According to current market data, AQN trades at a forward P/E of 16.75, which appears to discount the company as a distressed hybrid rather than a premium regulated utility, while the 4.4% dividend yield suggests investors are pricing in significant uncertainty regarding future payout sustainability.
The valuation gap relative to pure-play regulated peers like Avista or Portland General Electric suggests the market remains skeptical of the company's ability to successfully execute its strategic pivot. Investors should monitor whether the forward P/E multiple expands as the company sheds its renewable assets, which may eventually allow the stock to trade more in line with traditional, lower-risk utility multiples.
Based on reported financial figures, the company's ROE has frequently struggled to reach positive territory, with a notable -18.6% result in 2024Q3, indicating a significant and persistent gap between earned returns and the authorized ROE levels typical for regulated utility operations.
This consistent underperformance suggests that the company is facing substantial regulatory lag or operational inefficiencies that prevent it from capturing the full value of its rate base. The inability to consistently generate positive ROE warrants further investigation into whether the current regulatory environment in its primary jurisdictions is becoming increasingly punitive or if internal cost structures are misaligned with allowed recovery mechanisms.
As reported in quarterly filings, the debt-to-capital ratio has remained stubbornly elevated, hovering near 0.57 in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company's balance sheet remains vulnerable and heavily reliant on debt despite ongoing efforts to deleverage through asset divestitures.
The low interest coverage ratios, which dipped as low as 0.26 in 2024Q1, suggest that the company's financial flexibility is severely constrained by its historical debt burden. Investors should monitor the FFO-to-debt metrics closely, as any failure to improve these ratios may force the company to seek further dilutive equity financing to maintain its credit profile.
According to historical financial statements, the dividend payout ratio has exhibited extreme volatility, reaching 129.8% in 2025Q3, which suggests that current dividend levels are not consistently supported by core operating cash flows and may be at risk of further adjustment.
The reliance on external financing to fund both capital expenditures and dividend payments appears unsustainable in the current high-interest-rate environment. This pattern of payout instability indicates that the dividend is currently a secondary priority to balance sheet repair, and investors should be prepared for potential volatility in future distributions.
The most commonly misapplied metric for AQN is the standard P/E ratio, which obscures the underlying earnings volatility caused by non-cash charges and AFUDC, leading investors to potentially misinterpret the company's true earnings power relative to its regulated utility peers.
Because AQN utilizes significant non-cash accounting adjustments, the P/E ratio fails to capture the actual cash-generating capacity of the regulated assets. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or cash-flow-based valuation metrics to better assess the company's fundamental value, as these are less susceptible to the accounting distortions that currently plague the reported net income figures.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AQN stock.
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 24.4x. The historical average is 33.8x. This places it at the 21th percentile of its historical range.
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.8x.
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.2%. The historical average is 3.8%.
Based on historical data, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. is trading at a P/E of 24.4x. This is at the 21th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.'s current dividend yield is 4.73% with a payout ratio of 113.3%.
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. has 73.7% gross margin and 21.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.