Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -59.9x · EV/EBITDA 23.0x · ROE 9.5%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.9B | $15.9B | $9.6B | $8.1B | $5.0B | $5.3B | $3.1B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $20.2B | $18.3B | $12.2B | $10.2B | $7.4B | $6.0B | $4.1B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -59.86 | — | — | — | 172.49 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.26 | 2.01 | 1.37 | 1.17 | 0.76 | 1.35 | 0.86 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.04 | 4.67 | 3.26 | 2.84 | 2.35 | 2.28 | 1.97 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 26.94 | 24.01 | 17.96 | 19.01 | 26.20 | 41.75 | 6.72 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 23.54 | 20.97 | 15.53 | 15.83 | 18.54 | 29.13 | 6.20 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.31 | 1.73 | 1.48 | 1.13 | 1.52 | 1.14 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.97 | 20.76 | 15.48 | 15.46 | 15.94 | 17.71 | 42.30 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 36.53 | 33.02 | 25.56 | 27.14 | 34.07 | 43.07 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.59 | 22.69 | 23.91 | 38.89 | 47.14 | 8.96 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 31.4% | 31.0% | 28.0% | 26.1% | 23.8% | 21.1% | 20.1% | 21.1% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 7.0% | 6.9% | 5.2% | 2.5% | 3.5% | -4.6% | -16.3% | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.8% | 3.8% | 3.6% | 2.2% | 1.1% | 1.2% | -4.3% | -15.5% | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.5% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 6.1% | 3.3% | 2.4% | -9.2% | -12.8% | 14.6% | 9.1% |
| ROA | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.2% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 1.0% | -3.8% | -5.1% | 8.3% | 9.1% |
| ROIC | 7.4% | 7.4% | 6.9% | 5.7% | 3.2% | 3.6% | -4.6% | -6.0% | 10.2% | 7.6% |
| ROCE | 8.5% | 8.5% | 8.0% | 6.0% | 3.1% | 3.6% | -5.2% | -7.6% | 14.3% | 10.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.03 | 0.90 | 1.42 | 0.81 | 0.99 | 0.75 | 0.95 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.73 | 3.73 | 3.86 | 3.89 | 6.50 | 5.54 | 15.90 | — | 2.21 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 1.14 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.86 | -0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.70 | 2.70 | 3.23 | 3.16 | 5.20 | 2.03 | 10.59 | — | 2.01 | -0.15 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.58 | 4.73 | 4.89 | 12.69 | 5.39 | 2.24 | 7.60 | 14.37 | -0.24 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.93 | 3.93 | 3.26 | 2.60 | 1.74 | 2.32 | -2.54 | -9.07 | 7.64 | -0.23 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 1.38 | 3.03 | 1.71 | 1.63 | 1.14 | 76856.56 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.43 | 1.43 | 1.33 | 1.35 | 1.30 | 2.95 | 1.63 | 1.56 | 1.09 | 76856.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 1.37 | 0.61 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 76856.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.25 | 1.83 | 2.48 |
| Inventory Turnover | 37.41 | 37.41 | 33.85 | 33.25 | 29.72 | 43.49 | 44.23 | 13.57 | 52.52 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.11 | 98.66 | 96.47 | 98.62 | 91.16 | 79.47 | 361.29 | 98.40 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 54.4% | 99.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 0.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.7% | 4.2% | 5.6% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 2.4% | 14.9% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.5% | 6.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 1.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.5% | 6.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 1.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $416M | $402M | $353M | $399M | $309M | $254M | $261M | $175M | $121M |
High acquisition-related leverage
According to current market data, APG trades at a forward P/E of 24.18, which appears to reflect investor skepticism regarding the company's ability to sustain margin expansion while navigating the complex integration of its recent global acquisitions compared to pure-play service peers in the sector.
The valuation premium relative to historical earnings volatility suggests that the market is pricing in a transition toward a higher-margin service model rather than current GAAP profitability. Investors should monitor whether the forward multiple compresses as the company demonstrates consistent free cash flow conversion, which remains the primary catalyst for a potential re-rating.
Based on reported figures, APG's ROIC has remained consistently low, hovering between 1.1% and 2.6% over the last ten quarters, which suggests that the company's aggressive acquisition strategy has significantly diluted its return on invested capital through the accumulation of substantial goodwill and intangible assets.
The persistent gap between ROIC and the company's cost of capital warrants further investigation into the long-term value creation of its M&A-heavy business model. Unless management can demonstrate a clear path to improving asset utilization, the current trend suggests that capital is being deployed into growth that does not yet generate adequate economic returns.
As reported in financial statements, APG's cash conversion cycle has fluctuated between 47 and 78 days over the past ten quarters, indicating that the company faces ongoing challenges in managing its working capital efficiency across a decentralized and geographically diverse operational footprint.
The volatility in DSO and CCC suggests that the company's decentralized management model may be struggling to standardize billing and collection processes across its various business units. This inconsistency in working capital management likely contributes to the observed lumpiness in free cash flow, making short-term liquidity forecasting difficult for investors.
According to recent quarterly filings, APG's interest coverage ratio has shown extreme variance, ranging from 2.36x to 30.67x, which suggests that the company's ability to service its debt obligations is highly sensitive to the timing of restructuring charges and non-recurring integration costs.
While the reported debt-to-equity ratio appears low in recent periods, the historical reliance on debt to fund acquisitions implies that the company's true leverage profile may be more vulnerable than the headline figures suggest. Investors should monitor interest coverage trends closely, as any sustained decline in operating income could rapidly tighten the company's financial flexibility.
The most commonly misapplied metric for APG is the standard EV/EBITDA multiple, which obscures the company's true earning power by failing to account for the significant non-cash amortization and integration costs inherent in its aggressive buy-and-build strategy within the fire and life safety services industry.
Analysts should instead focus on cash flow from operations minus capital expenditures, as this provides a more accurate reflection of the company's ability to generate sustainable cash after accounting for the costs of maintaining its decentralized service network. Relying on EBITDA-based multiples likely leads to an inaccurate assessment of the company's valuation relative to its actual cash-generating capacity.
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying APG stock.
APi Group Corporation's current P/E ratio is -59.9x. The historical average is 172.5x.
APi Group Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 23.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 21.3x.
APi Group Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 9.5%. The historical average is 3.5%.
Based on historical data, APi Group Corporation is trading at a P/E of -59.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
APi Group Corporation has 31.4% gross margin and 7.0% operating margin.
APi Group Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.