Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -99.0%. (2019–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $336M | $29M | $61M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $303M | $-5049407 | $1M | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | 12.24 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.50 | 1.12 | 0.77 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | 0.25 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | 100.1% | — | 100.0% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -1352.2% | — | -18.9% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | -2099.2% | — | -124.0% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -99.0% | -99.0% | -132.1% | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | -51.5% | -51.5% | -103.4% | -57.6% | -67.3% | -266.6% | -165.0% |
| ROIC | -730.8% | -730.8% | -260.4% | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -103.8% | -103.8% | -84.6% | — | -27.5% | — | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.40 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.32 | -0.75 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -28.22 | -28.22 | -85.40 | -155.36 | -6.46 | -14.94 | -41.01 |
Net cash position: cash ($61M) exceeds total debt ($27M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.41 | 1.41 | 2.01 | 0.21 | 7.12 | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.41 | 1.41 | 2.01 | 0.21 | 7.12 | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.96 | 0.20 | 6.74 | 0.28 | 0.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | 0.04 | — | 0.35 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | 26.23 | — | 15.41 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $11M | $7M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M |
Clinical trial binary outcome
According to recent financial data, Adlai Nortye trades at a price-to-book ratio of 4.18, reflecting a market valuation that is heavily contingent on the successful clinical progression of its lead oncology asset rather than any current earnings or tangible book value generated from commercial operations.
The absence of meaningful P/E or P/S multiples underscores that the market is pricing the company as a pure-play clinical option rather than an operating business. Investors should monitor whether this premium holds as the company approaches critical data readouts, as any failure in the BURAN trial could lead to a rapid compression of these valuation multiples.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC of -168.5% in 2024Q1 highlights the extreme capital intensity of its current development phase, where massive R&D expenditures are required to advance the pipeline without any offsetting returns from commercialized products or sustainable revenue streams to support the capital base.
The persistent negative ROIC suggests that every dollar of invested capital is currently being consumed by clinical trial execution rather than generating economic value. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the company can achieve a positive return profile post-approval, or if the high cost of drug development will continue to suppress capital efficiency.
Based on 2024Q2 reported figures, the company maintains a current ratio of 1.85, which represents a notable improvement from the 0.16 ratio observed in 2023Q2, yet this liquidity position remains highly vulnerable to the ongoing, intensive cash burn required to sustain the Phase III BURAN trial.
While the current ratio suggests a temporary stabilization of working capital, the lack of recurring revenue means that liquidity is entirely dependent on external financing. Investors should monitor the cash runway closely, as any delay in clinical timelines could necessitate dilutive capital raises that would further erode shareholder value.
As indicated by recent SEC filings, the company's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.73 as of 2024Q2 reflects a strategic reliance on debt instruments to supplement equity funding during the high-cost development phase, rather than relying on operational cash generation to service its long-term financial obligations.
The use of debt in a pre-revenue biotech entity is unconventional and suggests that management is attempting to preserve equity value by leveraging the balance sheet. However, this increases the risk profile, as the company lacks the interest coverage capacity to handle significant debt service if clinical milestones are missed.
Based on the provided financial data, the most commonly misapplied metric for Adlai Nortye is the net margin, which obscures the company's true operational health by treating R&D as a standard expense rather than a long-term investment in the firm's primary, albeit unproven, intellectual property assets.
Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate and the clinical trial progress, as net margins are structurally negative for pre-revenue biotechs and provide no insight into the probability of future success. Relying on traditional profitability ratios in this context may lead to an incorrect assessment of the company's long-term viability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ANL stock.
Adlai Nortye Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is -2.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Adlai Nortye Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -99.0%. The historical average is -115.5%.
Based on historical data, Adlai Nortye Ltd. is trading at a P/E of -2.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.