Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.4x · EV/EBITDA 7.2x · ROE 30.3%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.9B | $9.1B | $7.5B | $9.4B | $6.7B | $9.1B | $8.1B | $7.4B | $6.1B | $8.0B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $10.7B | $11.0B | $9.3B | $10.9B | $8.0B | $10.2B | $9.4B | $9.2B | $7.7B | $8.4B | $7.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.44 | 12.42 | 11.68 | 19.23 | 15.79 | 20.85 | 43.04 | 15.99 | 32.22 | 18.80 | 12.70 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.90 | 0.76 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.54 | 3.54 | 3.31 | 3.65 | 2.54 | 3.42 | 3.33 | 3.48 | 3.23 | 1.93 | 1.84 |
| P/FCF | 12.46 | 12.77 | 15.71 | 22.95 | 52.17 | 30.64 | 15.82 | 44.82 | 171.26 | 21.92 | 19.48 |
| P/OCF | 7.70 | 7.90 | 7.12 | 9.56 | 9.37 | 12.03 | 9.49 | 11.51 | 10.38 | 8.58 | 8.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.01 | 0.89 | 1.04 | 0.91 | 1.24 | 1.27 | 1.07 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.75 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.18 | 7.32 | 6.79 | 10.23 | 7.83 | 9.58 | 12.53 | 8.53 | 7.15 | 6.53 | 6.20 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.85 | 10.07 | 9.44 | 15.50 | 12.08 | 15.19 | 25.91 | 12.79 | 11.41 | 9.84 | 8.89 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.33 | 19.33 | 26.71 | 62.55 | 34.59 | 18.52 | 55.80 | 216.34 | 22.93 | 20.34 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 19.2% | 18.5% | 17.4% | 15.8% | 18.4% | 16.7% | 18.5% | 19.7% | 16.2% | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 10.1% | 9.4% | 6.6% | 7.5% | 8.2% | 5.1% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 8.3% | 8.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.8% | 6.8% | 6.2% | 4.7% | 4.8% | 5.3% | 2.5% | 5.4% | 2.2% | 4.1% | 5.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 30.3% | 30.3% | 26.7% | 18.8% | 16.0% | 17.2% | 8.2% | 23.0% | 6.3% | 10.6% | 15.3% |
| ROA | 8.9% | 8.9% | 8.0% | 6.1% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 2.5% | 6.8% | 2.5% | 5.1% | 7.2% |
| ROIC | 19.4% | 19.4% | 18.1% | 12.8% | 12.7% | 13.3% | 7.4% | 14.6% | 12.8% | 14.7% | 15.7% |
| ROCE | 24.5% | 24.5% | 23.1% | 16.5% | 15.0% | 13.9% | 8.2% | 17.7% | 14.1% | 14.9% | 15.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.18 | 0.32 | 0.39 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.51 | 1.91 | 1.88 | 2.00 | 3.39 | 2.09 | 2.06 | 1.04 | 1.27 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.27 | 1.44 | 1.30 | 1.10 | 1.82 | 1.68 | 1.49 | 0.29 | 0.26 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.57 | 3.62 | 3.76 | 10.38 | 3.96 | 2.70 | 10.98 | 45.08 | 1.01 | 0.86 |
| Interest Coverage | 10.57 | 10.57 | 9.10 | 7.58 | 11.05 | 11.23 | 4.99 | 10.33 | 10.26 | 13.95 | 13.56 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.02 | 1.30 | 1.36 | 1.25 | 1.15 | 1.58 | 1.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.03 | 1.10 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 1.32 | 1.30 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.47 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.26 | 1.15 | 1.09 | 0.91 | 1.26 | 1.29 | 1.21 | 1.22 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.81 | 8.81 | 9.19 | 8.55 | 7.68 | 8.65 | 7.77 | 9.40 | 9.19 | 9.17 | 8.14 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 75.46 | 70.01 | 76.59 | 78.72 | 75.35 | 89.20 | 69.34 | 69.49 | 59.65 | 71.02 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.6% | 2.6% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 3.4% | 1.8% | 0.7% | 2.9% | 3.5% | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 32.4% | 32.4% | 33.9% | 46.1% | 53.0% | 37.9% | 28.9% | 47.0% | 112.6% | 48.9% | 35.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.0% | 8.1% | 8.6% | 5.2% | 6.3% | 4.8% | 2.3% | 6.3% | 3.1% | 5.3% | 7.9% |
| FCF Yield | 8.0% | 7.8% | 6.4% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 6.3% | 2.2% | 0.6% | 4.6% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.9% | 3.8% | 7.3% | 3.7% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.5% | 6.5% | 10.2% | 6.1% | 5.1% | 1.8% | 0.7% | 2.9% | 3.5% | 4.6% | 2.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $77M | $80M | $85M | $87M | $88M | $88M | $87M | $87M | $88M | $88M |
OEM Pricing Power Asymmetry
According to current market data, Autoliv trades at a forward P/E of 11.31 and an EV/EBITDA of 6.28, suggesting that investors are pricing in significant cyclical risk and limited margin expansion potential relative to the broader industrial sector's valuation premiums.
The current valuation appears to reflect a 'pure-play' hardware discount, as the market remains skeptical of the company's ability to decouple from global light vehicle production volatility. While the PEG ratio of 0.36 suggests potential undervaluation, this metric may be misleading if future earnings growth is constrained by the persistent price-down pressure inherent in OEM contracts.
Based on reported financial figures, Autoliv's ROIC has struggled to maintain momentum, oscillating between 3.5% and 6.4% over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the company is currently failing to consistently generate returns that meaningfully exceed its cost of capital.
The inability to sustain higher ROIC levels suggests that the capital-intensive nature of safety-critical manufacturing, combined with periodic restructuring charges, acts as a structural drag on performance. Investors should monitor whether upcoming EV platform launches can drive a shift in product mix that finally allows for a sustained expansion in capital efficiency.
As evidenced by the recent 2026Q1 data, the cash conversion cycle has expanded to 45 days, driven by fluctuations in inventory and receivables that highlight the company's limited leverage over its OEM customers during periods of production slowdowns.
The variability in the CCC suggests that Autoliv often bears the brunt of supply chain disruptions, forcing the company to carry higher inventory levels than its peers. This inefficiency appears to be a structural byproduct of its role as a Tier 1 supplier, where the requirement to ensure zero-defect delivery necessitates significant working capital buffers.
According to quarterly filings, Autoliv maintains a debt-to-equity ratio fluctuating near 0.9, which, when paired with interest coverage ratios consistently above 7x, suggests that the company's balance sheet remains resilient despite the inherent cyclicality of the automotive parts industry.
While the leverage profile is healthy, the reliance on debt to fund operations during cyclical troughs warrants careful monitoring, especially if interest rates remain elevated for an extended period. The current debt structure appears adequate for maintaining operations, but it provides limited room for aggressive, debt-funded inorganic growth without risking a credit profile downgrade.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to Autoliv, as it obscures the massive impact of non-recurring restructuring charges and retroactive OEM price adjustments that frequently distort quarterly net income figures, making the metric a poor proxy for underlying operational earning power.
Analysts should instead prioritize EV/EBITDA or free cash flow yield, as these metrics better account for the company's capital-intensive manufacturing footprint and the volatility of its working capital. Relying on P/E alone risks misinterpreting temporary accounting noise as a permanent shift in the company's competitive or financial standing.
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ALV stock.
Autoliv, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 12.4x. The historical average is 14.8x. This places it at the 52th percentile of its historical range.
Autoliv, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.3x.
Autoliv, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 30.3%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 11.9%.
Based on historical data, Autoliv, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 12.4x. This is at the 52th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Autoliv, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.60% with a payout ratio of 32.4%.
Autoliv, Inc. has 19.2% gross margin and 10.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Autoliv, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.