Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.4x · EV/EBITDA 23.3x · ROE 6.5%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.0B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $2.3B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $2.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 23.42 | 23.19 | 21.37 | 46.39 | — | 52.27 | 221.96 | — | — | 6.39 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.34 | 7.30 | 5.45 | 6.63 | 5.90 | 7.17 | 6.54 | 3.48 | 2.01 | 3.46 | 3.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.54 | 1.53 | 1.29 | 1.38 | 1.31 | 1.71 | 1.13 | 1.34 | 1.07 | 2.26 | 1.22 |
| P/FCF | 55.58 | 55.27 | 27.34 | 38.57 | 110.55 | 19.40 | 29.27 | — | 94.03 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 19.07 | 18.96 | 13.17 | 20.64 | 39.99 | 14.67 | 19.71 | 9.60 | 4.19 | — | 13.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.69 | 7.32 | 8.79 | 7.82 | 9.03 | 9.94 | 5.11 | 3.20 | 4.78 | 5.14 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.32 | 23.22 | 14.92 | 18.11 | 11.73 | 18.35 | 22.29 | 61.45 | 9.57 | 4.93 | 5.19 |
| EV / EBIT | 29.58 | 23.22 | 19.31 | 28.78 | 44.20 | 22.57 | 38.54 | — | — | 57.25 | 32.33 |
| EV / FCF | — | 73.40 | 36.68 | 51.15 | 146.63 | 24.42 | 44.52 | — | 149.59 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.5% | 46.5% | 45.5% | 49.0% | 42.3% | 46.9% | 33.7% | 21.7% | 40.7% | 29.0% | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | 32.9% | 32.9% | 33.7% | 30.9% | 50.2% | 33.6% | 22.3% | -3.3% | 26.8% | 6.8% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 31.3% | 31.3% | 25.6% | 14.3% | -22.0% | 13.9% | 2.9% | -8.4% | -10.7% | 53.7% | -2.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.0% | 2.9% | -4.8% | 3.3% | 0.5% | -3.1% | -7.4% | 24.5% | -0.8% |
| ROA | 3.9% | 3.9% | 3.7% | 1.7% | -2.8% | 1.8% | 0.3% | -1.7% | -3.1% | 10.4% | -0.5% |
| ROIC | 3.5% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 1.8% | -0.6% | 8.1% | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| ROCE | 4.5% | 4.5% | 5.5% | 4.4% | 7.4% | 4.8% | 2.2% | -0.7% | 10.2% | 1.7% | 2.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.97 | 0.42 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.87 | 5.87 | 4.09 | 4.59 | 3.10 | 4.30 | 8.31 | 20.06 | 3.61 | 1.53 | 1.34 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.86 | 0.42 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.74 | 5.74 | 3.80 | 4.45 | 2.89 | 3.78 | 7.64 | 19.64 | 3.56 | 1.36 | 1.34 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 18.13 | 9.35 | 12.58 | 36.08 | 5.03 | 15.25 | — | 55.56 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 3.97 | 3.97 | 3.51 | 2.77 | 1.86 | 3.86 | 1.62 | -0.18 | -0.50 | 1.39 | 2.34 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.62 | 0.99 | 1.81 | 1.73 | 3.12 | 0.33 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.62 | 0.90 | 1.67 | 1.57 | 2.92 | 0.30 | 0.58 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | 6.65 | 6.86 | 16.47 | 14.43 | 9.47 | 6.20 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.3% | 4.4% | 5.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 2.6% | 1.1% | 3.3% | 12.1% | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Payout Ratio | 101.6% | 101.6% | 107.3% | 215.8% | — | 131.6% | 246.4% | — | — | 4.5% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | 2.2% | — | 1.9% | 0.5% | — | — | 15.6% | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.8% | 1.8% | 3.7% | 2.6% | 0.9% | 5.2% | 3.4% | — | 1.1% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.7% | 4.7% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 4.8% | 2.6% | 1.2% | 3.4% | 12.2% | 1.2% | 0.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $73M | $73M | $73M | $73M | $73M | $72M | $72M | $71M | $53M | $49M |
Non-core asset divestment drag
Based on reported financial data, the company's P/FFO multiple of 13.56 in 2025Q4 suggests a valuation discount relative to mainland grocery-anchored peers, likely reflecting investor uncertainty regarding the finality of the ongoing strategic transition away from legacy non-core business segments and toward a pure-play Hawai'i model.
The current valuation appears to be heavily influenced by the lumpy earnings profile of the Materials & Construction segment, which obscures the underlying stability of the core retail portfolio. Investors should monitor whether the successful divestment of these non-core assets leads to a re-rating of the stock as it aligns more closely with pure-play REIT multiples.
According to quarterly filings, NOI margins fluctuated between 41.3% and 50.7% over the last ten quarters, indicating that the core rental business faces operational variability likely tied to the integration of legacy assets and the inherent cost structure of managing a geographically concentrated Hawai'i portfolio.
The inconsistency in property-level profitability suggests that the company's core CRE operations are still burdened by the overhead of managing a diverse land portfolio. A sustained expansion in margins may only be realized once the company fully sheds its non-core business segments and achieves a more streamlined cost structure.
As reported in recent financial statements, Alexander & Baldwin's AFFO frequently fails to cover dividend payments, with the 2025Q4 payout ratio reaching 124%, highlighting a significant reliance on non-recurring cash sources to sustain distributions to shareholders during this period of strategic portfolio transition and simplification.
The high payout ratio relative to AFFO suggests that the current dividend level may be unsustainable without a significant improvement in recurring cash flow generation. Investors should monitor whether management prioritizes dividend stability over the capital requirements needed to maintain the aging Hawai'i asset base.
Based on the company's reported figures, the debt-to-equity ratio stood at 0.51 in 2025Q4, which appears to provide a fortress-like cushion against interest rate volatility compared to more highly levered retail REIT peers that often carry significantly higher debt burdens in the current macro environment.
This conservative capital structure offers the company significant optionality to navigate the ongoing portfolio simplification without the immediate pressure of refinancing risk. However, the low leverage should be viewed in the context of the capital-intensive nature of the remaining Hawai'i portfolio, which may require future investment.
The most commonly misapplied metric for Alexander & Baldwin is the standard P/E ratio, which fails to account for the significant non-cash depreciation charges inherent in real estate ownership, thereby obscuring the company's true recurring cash-generating ability and distorting comparisons with non-REIT entities.
Investors should instead focus on P/FFO or P/AFFO, as these metrics adjust for depreciation and provide a more accurate reflection of the cash available for distribution. Relying on P/E in this context may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the company's valuation relative to its actual operational performance.
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ALEX stock.
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 23.4x. The historical average is 32.5x. This places it at the 44th percentile of its historical range.
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 23.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.5x.
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.5%. The historical average is 3.3%.
Based on historical data, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 23.4x. This is at the 44th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 4.32% with a payout ratio of 101.6%.
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. has 46.5% gross margin and 32.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.