Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -249.8%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11M | $32M | $3.2B | $2.1B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3M | $24M | $3.2B | $2.1B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.35 | 7.05 | 3400.00 | 11634.82 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.48 | 2.54 | 2057.23 | 85.95 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.41 | 3403.01 | 11601.84 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 54.3% | -261.2% | -799.4% | 30.1% | 45.3% |
| Operating Margin | -349.4% | -349.4% | -706.4% | -5208.8% | -1176.3% | -1581.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -389.4% | -389.4% | -2743.8% | -1028.6% | -1300.2% | -1761.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -249.8% | -249.8% | -198.1% | -9.9% | -139.0% | — |
| ROA | -104.4% | -104.4% | -130.5% | -7.7% | -39.0% | -78.1% |
| ROIC | -248.1% | -248.1% | -43.5% | -37.6% | -36.9% | -431.8% |
| ROCE | -121.7% | -121.7% | -39.8% | -48.5% | -121.9% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 3.81 | 0.02 | 0.56 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.59 | 1.82 | -0.24 | 0.46 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -20.59 | -20.59 | -20.07 | -89.69 | -31.03 | -29.42 |
Net cash position: cash ($8M) exceeds total debt ($384597)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.70 | 2.70 | 0.98 | 3.59 | 0.61 | 0.19 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.70 | 2.70 | 0.98 | 3.59 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.15 | 2.15 | 0.75 | 3.13 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 0.10 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $45M | $43M | $2M | $40M |
High Operating Burn Rate
According to recent market data, AIRE trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.49, suggesting that investors are currently valuing the company at a significant discount to its reported book value, likely reflecting deep skepticism regarding the long-term viability of its current asset-heavy, loss-making business model.
The absence of a positive P/E ratio and the reliance on P/S multiples indicate that the market is pricing the firm as a venture-stage technology play rather than a traditional real estate service provider. This valuation approach appears highly sensitive to AI-related sentiment, which may decouple the stock price from the underlying fundamental reality of persistent operating losses.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained deeply negative, reaching -63.6% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm is currently destroying shareholder capital rather than compounding it through its property syndication and platform services activities.
The consistent decay in returns on invested capital suggests that the company's core business model is struggling to achieve the necessary scale to cover its high fixed-cost base. Investors should monitor whether this trend is a temporary byproduct of early-stage platform development or a structural inability to generate positive returns on property-related investments.
Based on historical data, the company's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.04 as of 2026Q1, highlighting a fundamental disconnect between the firm's capital deployment and its ability to generate meaningful revenue from its property and platform service segments.
The erratic nature of the cash conversion cycle, characterized by significant fluctuations in days sales outstanding, suggests that the company faces challenges in managing its working capital effectively. This inefficiency appears to be a direct consequence of the sporadic timing of property syndication events, which complicates the firm's ability to maintain a predictable operational rhythm.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's current ratio has shown extreme volatility, dropping to 0.53 in 2025Q2 before recovering to 2.13 in 2026Q1, which indicates that the firm's ability to meet short-term obligations remains highly sensitive to the timing of property syndication cash inflows.
The reliance on episodic funding events to maintain liquidity suggests that the company is vulnerable to sudden shifts in retail investor appetite or broader market conditions. Without a more stable source of recurring revenue, the firm's liquidity position may remain subject to significant stress during periods of reduced transaction volume.
The market's reliance on P/S multiples to value AIRE obscures the underlying reality that a significant portion of revenue is tied to one-time property syndication fees rather than recurring, high-margin software subscriptions, which may lead to an overestimation of the company's long-term earnings potential.
Investors should prioritize evaluating the company based on its ability to generate recurring management fees and its customer acquisition costs rather than top-line revenue growth. Using P/S as a primary valuation tool for this business model risks ignoring the high-cost, transaction-heavy nature of the firm's current operations, which may not be sustainable in the long term.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AIRE stock.
reAlpha Tech Corp. Common Stock's current P/E ratio is -0.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
reAlpha Tech Corp. Common Stock's return on equity (ROE) is -249.8%. The historical average is -149.2%.
Based on historical data, reAlpha Tech Corp. Common Stock is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
reAlpha Tech Corp. Common Stock has 54.3% gross margin and -349.4% operating margin.