Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 0.2x · EV/EBITDA 0.4x · ROE 15.1%. (2015–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2M | $37M | $44M | $40M | $52M | $333M | $361M | $560M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3M | $35M | $52M | $36M | $35M | $333M | $359M | $554M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 0.19 | 11.74 | — | 3.49 | 14.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.05 | 1.14 | 0.47 | 0.20 | 1.41 | 6245.55 | 508.29 | 109.62 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.03 | 1.68 | 2.26 | 1.31 | 2.06 | 90.16 | 30.44 | 98.00 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.23 | 5.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.23 | 5.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.11 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 0.95 | 6246.49 | 506.22 | 108.35 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.45 | 5.94 | — | 2.79 | 6.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 0.45 | 5.96 | — | 2.24 | 7.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 4.99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 21.4% | 4.5% | 20.8% | 18.0% | 27.7% | 65.8% | 67.7% | 71.8% | 66.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 18.6% | -9.9% | 6.2% | 13.4% | -1900.7% | -172.8% | -46.3% | 40.5% | 35.6% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.7% | 9.7% | -8.0% | 5.7% | 9.7% | -2058.2% | -220.2% | -164.6% | 31.1% | 34.1% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.1% | 15.1% | -29.8% | 41.4% | 24.7% | -14.1% | -17.8% | -121.6% | 63.1% | 114.5% | — |
| ROA | 3.9% | 3.9% | -6.7% | 10.7% | 7.4% | -10.6% | -13.4% | -50.1% | 22.1% | 44.8% | -1337.3% |
| ROIC | 17.7% | 17.7% | -22.3% | 44.1% | 61.7% | -10.8% | -19.2% | -384.4% | 140.9% | 103.2% | — |
| ROCE | 28.7% | 28.7% | -36.8% | 44.2% | 32.8% | -13.1% | -14.0% | -34.2% | 82.1% | 119.5% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.49 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.86 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.37 | 0.37 | — | 0.65 | 0.32 | — | — | — | 0.24 | 1.48 | 0.49 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.05 | 0.41 | -0.12 | -0.67 | 0.01 | -0.12 | -1.14 | -0.79 | -0.13 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.20 | -0.20 | — | -0.29 | -3.33 | — | — | — | -1.20 | -0.23 | 0.38 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.24 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($1M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 1.39 | 2.44 | 2.74 | 2.68 | 1.30 | 1.38 | 0.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1.05 | 1.19 | 1.03 | 2.44 | 3.00 | 2.68 | 0.51 | 1.20 | 0.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.78 | 2.51 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.52 | 0.95 | 1.62 | 0.41 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.66 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.93 | 0.93 | 16.13 | 50.01 | 1.34 | — | — | — | 0.27 | 2.03 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 200.10 | 33.93 | 169.57 | 30.30 | 3537.43 | 34.22 | — | 16.98 | 165.31 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 100.0% | 8.5% | — | 28.7% | 6.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 19.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $485100 | $485100 | $485100 | $430220 | $435758 | $425980 | $419020 | $428200 | $428200 | $666200 |
Operational and liquidity insolvency
According to recent market data, AGMH trades at a P/S ratio of 0.05, which, based on reported financial figures, suggests the market is pricing the firm as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented technology entity, given the severe contraction in its core hardware revenue streams.
The extremely low P/S and P/B multiples indicate that investors assign negligible value to the company's future earnings potential or asset base. This valuation profile appears consistent with a business model that has failed to establish a recurring revenue moat, leaving it vulnerable to the cyclicality of the cryptocurrency hardware market.
As reported in financial statements, AGMH's gross margins have compressed to 11.6% in recent quarters, a trend that, when compared to historical peaks, suggests the company lacks the pricing power necessary to maintain profitability in a competitive ASIC hardware distribution environment.
The inability to sustain operating margins above the low double digits implies that the company's cost structure is poorly optimized for its current revenue scale. Investors should monitor whether the firm can pivot toward higher-margin software services, as the current hardware-heavy model appears structurally incapable of generating consistent net income.
Based on the reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has ballooned to 306 days in 2025Q2, which, compared to historical norms, indicates a significant deterioration in the company's ability to manage inventory and collect receivables effectively amidst a sharp decline in business activity.
The extended DSO and DIO metrics suggest that the company is struggling to move hardware inventory, potentially leading to obsolescence risks. This inefficiency in working capital management directly contributes to the firm's cash-burning status and limits its operational flexibility.
As indicated by the most recent quarterly filings, the company's cash position has dwindled to approximately $1.17 million, a level that, when measured against current cash burn rates, suggests the firm may face significant liquidity constraints in the near term without external financing.
While the current ratio of 1.93 might appear adequate on the surface, the high inventory dependence and the rapid erosion of cash reserves suggest that the company's liquidity position is far more precarious than the headline numbers imply. The lack of a robust cash buffer leaves little room for error in navigating regulatory or market-driven shocks.
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for AGMH, as the company's earnings are frequently distorted by non-recurring items and extreme revenue volatility, which, based on our analysis, renders traditional earnings-based valuation models largely irrelevant for assessing the firm's true fundamental health.
Investors should instead focus on cash-based metrics and the stability of the HighSharp partnership, as the P/E ratio fails to account for the company's underlying hardware-reseller business model. Relying on P/E in this context risks ignoring the existential threat posed by the firm's inability to generate sustainable free cash flow.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AGMH stock.
AGM Group Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 0.2x. The historical average is 9.9x.
AGM Group Holdings Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 0.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.2x.
AGM Group Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 15.1%. The historical average is 8.4%.
Based on historical data, AGM Group Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of 0.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AGM Group Holdings Inc. has 21.4% gross margin and 18.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
AGM Group Holdings Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.