Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 49.5x · EV/EBITDA 12.7x · ROE 7.4%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.5B | $8.1B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $2.2B | $2.7B | $2.9B | $2.5B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $8.1B | $7.6B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $2.3B | $2.7B | $2.8B | $2.5B | $1.2B | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 49.46 | 47.60 | — | — | — | — | 122.18 | — | — | — | 152.60 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.68 | 6.31 | 2.89 | 3.01 | 3.50 | 4.63 | 7.91 | 6.70 | 3.51 | 4.22 | 4.18 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.65 | 2.55 | 1.20 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.93 | 3.41 | 3.73 | 1.82 | 1.91 | 2.02 |
| P/FCF | 24.31 | 22.96 | 44.03 | — | — | — | — | 115.41 | — | — | 33.37 |
| P/OCF | 15.10 | 14.26 | 10.68 | 35.88 | 170.18 | 39.57 | 36.40 | 17.65 | 32.52 | 15.81 | 12.53 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.94 | 2.96 | 3.24 | 3.65 | 4.60 | 7.71 | 6.73 | 3.83 | 3.91 | 3.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.67 | 11.93 | 13.27 | — | 23.32 | 16.13 | 29.24 | 70.40 | — | 94.85 | 10.85 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.66 | 21.33 | — | — | — | 71.48 | 67.61 | — | — | — | 44.86 |
| EV / FCF | — | 21.60 | 44.97 | — | — | — | — | 115.82 | — | — | 31.33 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 34.8% | 34.3% | 4.4% | 2.7% | 17.3% | 28.7% | 18.4% | -4.5% | 6.1% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | 27.8% | -0.7% | -31.0% | -6.3% | 8.4% | 11.0% | -8.7% | -80.8% | -26.9% | 9.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.1% | 13.1% | -18.2% | -23.4% | -18.2% | -0.8% | 6.3% | -11.0% | -66.2% | -20.2% | 2.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.4% | 7.4% | -7.5% | -9.8% | -8.1% | -0.4% | 3.1% | -6.4% | -34.7% | -8.8% | 1.5% |
| ROA | 5.0% | 5.0% | -5.2% | -6.6% | -5.4% | -0.3% | 2.1% | -4.2% | -23.9% | -6.5% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 13.1% | 13.1% | -0.2% | -9.0% | -2.0% | 3.4% | 4.2% | -3.5% | -31.4% | -10.2% | 3.8% |
| ROCE | 11.7% | 11.7% | -0.2% | -9.4% | -2.0% | 3.2% | 3.9% | -3.5% | -31.3% | -9.3% | 3.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.49 | 0.49 | 1.90 | — | 2.52 | 1.32 | 1.69 | 5.04 | — | 3.12 | 0.48 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.15 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.07 | -0.01 | -0.09 | 0.01 | 0.17 | -0.14 | -0.12 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.75 | -0.75 | 0.28 | — | 0.98 | -0.10 | -0.78 | 0.24 | — | -7.76 | -0.71 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.36 | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | 0.40 | — | — | -2.05 |
| Interest Coverage | 23.64 | 23.64 | -0.71 | -11.85 | -3.90 | 2.22 | 3.46 | -2.19 | -18.67 | -25.75 | 7.99 |
Net cash position: cash ($792M) exceeds total debt ($314M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.56 | 2.57 | 2.21 | 2.30 | 3.50 | 3.38 | 2.86 | 3.14 | 3.64 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.41 | 2.41 | 2.12 | 2.04 | 1.83 | 1.95 | 3.18 | 2.96 | 2.30 | 2.79 | 3.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.12 | 2.12 | 1.75 | 1.56 | 1.11 | 1.53 | 2.70 | 2.44 | 1.09 | 2.38 | 2.88 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.35 |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.86 | 9.86 | 5.89 | 8.65 | 9.42 | 8.01 | 8.05 | 9.86 | 9.93 | 13.14 | 12.39 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 34.79 | 30.06 | 30.83 | 24.00 | 33.73 | 45.70 | 33.58 | 78.40 | 28.87 | 8.44 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 6.0% | 6.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.0% | 2.1% | — | — | — | — | 0.8% | — | — | — | 0.7% |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 4.4% | 2.3% | — | — | — | — | 0.9% | — | — | 3.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $485M | $296M | $282M | $263M | $245M | $216M | $202M | $184M | $165M | $164M |
Mexican Regulatory Tax Exposure
According to current market data, AG trades at a forward P/E of 19.08, which appears to command a premium relative to diversified peers, suggesting investors are pricing the company as a high-beta silver vehicle rather than a traditional mining operator with standard operational risks.
The valuation multiple implies significant growth expectations that may be disconnected from the underlying volatility of its Mexican mining assets. Investors should monitor whether this premium persists as the company's production mix shifts increasingly toward gold, potentially diluting its identity as a pure-play silver investment.
Based on reported figures, the company's ROIC has recovered to 6.5% in 2026Q1 from negative levels in early 2024, indicating that recent operational restructuring and asset optimization are finally beginning to generate positive returns on the capital deployed into its mining infrastructure.
While the upward trend is encouraging, the current ROIC remains modest compared to the capital-intensive nature of the business. Sustained improvement will require consistent grade performance at San Dimas and successful integration of its remaining active assets to justify the heavy investment in property, plant, and equipment.
As reported in recent financial statements, the cash conversion cycle has tightened to 36 days in 2026Q1, reflecting improved management of inventory and receivables despite the inherent logistical complexities of operating within the Mexican mining sector compared to historical periods of higher inefficiency.
The reduction in the cash conversion cycle suggests that the company is becoming more adept at managing its working capital, which is critical for maintaining liquidity in a cyclical commodity environment. However, investors should remain cautious regarding the potential for VAT receivable delays to periodically distort these efficiency metrics.
According to the latest quarterly filings, the company maintains a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09, which provides a significant buffer against commodity price volatility and supports the firm's ability to navigate the high fixed-cost structure typical of its underground mining operations.
This low leverage profile is a structural strength that distinguishes the company from more debt-burdened peers, allowing for greater flexibility in capital allocation. The interest coverage ratio of 39.51 further suggests that debt service is currently well-supported by operating income, minimizing immediate refinancing risks.
The silver-equivalent ounce (SEO) ratio is frequently misapplied by market participants to evaluate production, as it obscures the underlying shift toward gold and masks the impact of streaming agreements that cap the upside on the company's most productive silver assets.
Investors should instead focus on segment-level cash costs and AISC to understand the true profitability of each mine. Relying on consolidated SEO figures may lead to an overestimation of the company's exposure to silver price appreciation while underestimating the operational realities of its gold-producing assets.
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AG stock.
First Majestic Silver Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 49.5x. The historical average is 66.4x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
First Majestic Silver Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 33.9x.
First Majestic Silver Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.4%. The historical average is -24.5%.
Based on historical data, First Majestic Silver Corp. is trading at a P/E of 49.5x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
First Majestic Silver Corp.'s current dividend yield is 0.12% with a payout ratio of 6.0%.
First Majestic Silver Corp. has 34.8% gross margin and 27.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
First Majestic Silver Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.