Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.3x · EV/EBITDA 4.0x · ROE -35.0%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $532M | $286M | $939M | $1.2B | $663M | $2.6B | $2.9B | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $304M | $58M | $2.5B | $3.0B | $2.7B | $4.5B | $4.9B | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.29 | — | — | — | — | 47.18 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.71 | 0.93 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.94 | 0.52 | 1.25 | 1.06 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 1.17 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 9.66 | 5.19 | 24.87 | 6.27 | 9.25 | 27.15 | 9.34 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 8.65 | 4.64 | 10.08 | 5.13 | 6.33 | 20.43 | 8.50 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.02 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1.25 | 1.55 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.02 | 0.77 | — | 11.59 | — | 9.60 | 16.03 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 63.16 | — | 19.70 | 91.31 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 1.05 | 65.46 | 15.84 | 37.06 | 47.61 | 15.56 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 14.0% | 14.2% | 12.4% | 13.0% | 17.7% | 19.1% | 16.4% | 16.2% | 23.3% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.6% | -3.6% | -8.3% | 1.2% | -41.0% | 6.4% | 2.1% | 5.6% | -29.4% | 10.5% | 10.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.4% | -6.4% | -9.2% | -1.6% | -37.9% | 1.5% | -5.6% | -0.6% | -31.2% | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -35.0% | -35.0% | -35.3% | -5.4% | -72.4% | 2.1% | -8.4% | -1.3% | -67.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% |
| ROA | -7.7% | -7.7% | -9.5% | -1.6% | -27.3% | 0.9% | -3.0% | -0.4% | -19.4% | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| ROIC | -7.3% | -7.3% | -8.6% | 1.1% | -28.9% | 3.8% | 1.1% | 3.4% | -17.9% | 3.8% | 3.5% |
| ROCE | -5.1% | -5.1% | -10.0% | 1.4% | -33.7% | 4.4% | 1.3% | 3.9% | -19.5% | 3.9% | 3.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 2.32 | 1.73 | 1.72 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 1.99 | 1.92 | 1.55 | 1.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.17 | 0.17 | — | 7.48 | — | 4.48 | 7.08 | 7.46 | — | 6.89 | 7.29 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.41 | 2.05 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 1.88 | 1.84 | 1.53 | 1.53 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.00 | -3.00 | — | 7.00 | — | 4.13 | 6.41 | 7.05 | — | 6.78 | 7.10 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -4.13 | 40.59 | 9.57 | 27.81 | 20.46 | 6.22 | 31.78 | 38.78 | 20.48 | 30.90 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.91 | -0.91 | -2.01 | 0.28 | -14.11 | 1.66 | 0.23 | 0.92 | -4.75 | 1.32 | 1.27 |
Net cash position: cash ($241M) exceeds total debt ($13M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.98 | 1.87 | 1.93 | 1.71 | 1.56 | 1.84 | 1.86 | 1.51 | 1.61 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.96 | 1.81 | 1.80 | 1.60 | 1.49 | 1.79 | 1.82 | 1.50 | 1.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.25 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.27 | 1.15 | 1.03 | 0.86 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.35 | 0.32 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 379.49 | 114.86 | 40.54 | 41.92 | 57.75 | 125.72 | 188.45 | 485.77 | 326.14 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 61.30 | 65.43 | 62.76 | 88.39 | 81.49 | 67.58 | 67.02 | 63.38 | 72.97 | 66.33 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 2.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.3% | 19.3% | 4.0% | 16.0% | 10.8% | 3.7% | 10.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 3.6% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 3.6% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $13M | $9M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M |
Structural margin compression risk
Based on recent market data, ADV trades at a P/S ratio of 0.17 and a P/FCF of 10.64, suggesting that investors are pricing the firm as a distressed asset rather than a growth-oriented service provider, reflecting deep skepticism regarding its long-term earnings potential.
The negative P/E ratio of -2.52 highlights the absence of sustainable bottom-line profitability, rendering traditional earnings-based valuation metrics largely irrelevant for this entity. Investors should monitor whether the low EV/EBITDA multiple of 4.72 represents a genuine value opportunity or a value trap resulting from the company's inability to convert its massive revenue base into meaningful shareholder value.
According to historical financial data, ADV's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, frequently dipping into negative values such as the -28.7% reported in 2025Q4, which indicates that the company is currently destroying rather than compounding capital invested in its core retail brokerage operations.
The persistent decay in ROIC suggests that the firm's historical acquisition-led growth strategy has failed to generate the necessary synergies to offset the high costs of its labor-intensive business model. This trend warrants further investigation into whether management can pivot toward a more capital-efficient service delivery model or if the current asset base remains fundamentally overvalued.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at approximately 0.32, revealing a structural inability to generate sufficient revenue from its existing asset base, which is compounded by DSO levels hovering around 60 to 70 days.
The extended collection cycle suggests that ADV lacks significant leverage over its large retail clients, forcing the company to carry the burden of working capital for extended periods. This inefficiency, combined with the lack of clear inventory turnover data, implies that the firm's cash conversion cycle is likely a significant drag on its overall operational liquidity.
Based on reported figures, the D/E ratio has seen a dramatic shift to 0.05% in 2026Q1, a development that appears to be an outlier or the result of a major recapitalization event that warrants extreme caution from analysts evaluating the firm's true long-term solvency.
While the nominal reduction in debt levels may appear positive, the company's inability to maintain consistent interest coverage—often falling into negative territory—suggests that the firm remains financially vulnerable despite the reported balance sheet cleanup. Investors should monitor whether this deleveraging is sustainable or if it has come at the expense of necessary investments in the business.
The most commonly misapplied metric for ADV is the P/S ratio, which obscures the company's thin 13.95% gross margin and the high proportion of pass-through labor costs that inflate top-line revenue without contributing to actual economic profit or shareholder value.
Analysts should instead focus on the company's ability to generate sustainable free cash flow margins, as the P/S ratio fails to account for the significant operational expenses required to maintain the firm's field labor force. Relying on revenue multiples in this context may lead to an overestimation of the company's intrinsic value by ignoring the structural margin pressures inherent in the retail brokerage industry.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ADV stock.
Advantage Solutions Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.3x. The historical average is 47.2x.
Advantage Solutions Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 4.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.5x.
Advantage Solutions Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -35.0%. The historical average is -22.0%.
Based on historical data, Advantage Solutions Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Advantage Solutions Inc. has 14.0% gross margin and -3.6% operating margin.
Advantage Solutions Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.