HD vs LOW

For growth investors, The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc.

(LOW) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus The Home Depot, Inc. at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lowe's Companies, Inc. wins at 2. 00x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 47x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc.

(LOW) delivered a total return of +25. 8%, compared to +23. 0% for The Home Depot, Inc. (HD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HD returned +213. 5% versus LOW's +212. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lowe's Companies, Inc.

(LOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 0. 71β — meaning HD is approximately 4% more volatile than LOW relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus 3. 1% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lowe's Companies, Inc. grew EPS -3. 1% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for The Home Depot, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HD leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Home Depot, Inc.

(HD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 7. 7% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus 11. 8% for LOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOW leads at 33. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 00x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 47x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) trades at 17. 7x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for The Home Depot, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LOW: 24. 8% to $279. 18.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lowe's Companies, Inc.

(LOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 1% yield, +212. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOW: +212. 6%, HD: +213. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.