Drug Manufacturers - General
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BMY vs MRK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
BMY vs MRK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $118.36B | $318.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48.48B | $65.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.28B | $8.94B |
| Gross Margin | 68.7% | 75.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7% | 27.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $47.14B | $50.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.21B | $14.56B |
BMY vs MRK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | Jul 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 98.8 | -1.2% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) | 100 | 168.4 | +68.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMY vs MRK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 25.1x)
- 15.0% margin vs MRK's 13.6%
- 4.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.5%
MRK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 1.2%, EPS growth 8.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- 175.5% 10Y total return vs BMY's 5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.2% revenue growth vs BMY's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 25.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs MRK's 13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs BMY's 0.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.4% vs BMY's +30.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs MRK's 7.0%, ROIC 16.9% vs 22.0% |
BMY vs MRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BMY vs MRK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BMY and MRK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRK and BMY operate at a comparable scale, with $65.6B and $48.5B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.0% (BMY) to 13.6% (MRK).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48.5B | $65.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15.7B | $24.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.3B | $8.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11.9B | $14.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.7% | +75.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +27.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | -185.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, BMY trades at a 5% valuation discount to MRK's 17.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMY's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRK's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $118.4B | $318.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $155.3B | $354.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.80x | 17.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.18x | 25.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.38x | 12.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 4.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.39x | 6.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.21x | 25.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MRK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $18 for MRK. MRK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs MRK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.0% | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.9% | +22.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.7% | +23.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.55x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $36.9B | $36.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.2B | $14.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $47.1B | $50.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.33x | 12.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRK five years ago would be worth $18,338 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,377 for BMY. Over the past 12 months, MRK leads with a +63.4% total return vs BMY's +30.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRK at 4.8% vs BMY's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.1% | +63.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.2% | +27.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.8% | +83.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | +175.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | +4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRK is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BMY's 0.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRK currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs BMY's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.89 | $130.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.52 | $76.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.2M | 7.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BMY and MRK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BMY as "Hold" and MRK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for BMY (target: $63) vs 3.8% for MRK (target: $134). For income investors, BMY offers the higher dividend yield at 4.26% vs MRK's 2.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.60 | $133.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.47 | $3.26 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
MRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BMY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Custom Comparison: BMY vs MRK
Compare on any lens — Growth, Value, Income, or pick from 130+ individual metrics.
BMY vs MRK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMY or MRK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the stronger pick with 1. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BMY or MRK?
On trailing P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the cheapest at 16.
8x versus Merck & Co. , Inc. at 17. 7x. On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BMY or MRK?
Over the past 5 years, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) delivered a total return of +83. 4%, compared to +3. 8% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRK returned +175. 5% versus BMY's +5. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BMY or MRK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's 0. 27β — meaning BMY is approximately 36% more volatile than MRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BMY or MRK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is pulling ahead at 1. 2% versus -0. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to 8. 0% for Merck & Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MRK leads at 3. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BMY or MRK?
Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus 14. 6% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRK leads at 36. 2% versus 26. 3% for BMY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRK leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BMY or MRK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 9.
2x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Merck & Co. , Inc. — 15. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BMY: 8. 0% to $62. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — BMY or MRK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 2. 5% for Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK).
09Is BMY or MRK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 2. 5% yield, +175. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRK: +175. 5%, BMY: +5. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BMY and MRK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Related Comparisons
Other popular comparisons that include one of these companies.